Kat and I saw The Mist tonight, and oh boy, do I need to talk about it.
This “review” will be spoiler-filled, so if you don’t want to have any details, much less the ending, spoiled for you, stop reading NOW!
Okay, I’m going to break it down bit by bit, saving the infamous ending for, well, the end. (I can say “infamous” because in every single review I’ve read so far, it is without a doubt the most disputed element of the movie.)
Before I start, I have to say that I have never seen my wife so angry about a movie before. She said she has never hated a movie more than The Mist.
Me? I liked it. For awhile. Until the end.
The Story
Bad storm brings strange mist filled with tentacles, pterodactyls, and giant spiders (among other things). David Drayton and his young son are trapped in a grocery store with a bunch of others, including a religious wacko who sees all this as the End of Days. The movie isn’t so much about the nasties in the mist as it is about the nasties in the grocery store.
The Monsters
I’ve been waiting many years for someone to make a movie out of The Mist. Mostly because I am completely creeped out by spiders, and The Mist has got some nasty ones. These spiders are as big as dogs and they shoot acid-coated webbing. Overall I felt the special effects in the film were a little too cartoony for me in spots, but the spiders didn’t disappoint.
The Ending
Oh boy. Well, I’ve gotta tell you what it is before I go on, so here goes. Please don’t read on if you don’t want to be spoiled.
Okay, so Drayton, his son, Amanda Dumfries, the old lady, and the old man pile into Drayton’s jeep and drive off. They head back to Drayton’s house to get his wife — surprise, she’s dead, spun up by the spiders (in the original story, the road is blocked and Drayton never finds out what happened to his wife; I guess you can’t have that kind of ambiguity in a Hollywood movie). So they head south, as far as their gas will take them. They run out of gas. They stop. They hear the monsters closing in. Drayton takes out the gun. Four bullets left, five of them in the jeep. So Drayton shoots everyone in the car and steps out to let the monsters have him. But wait! The army shows up! And the mist is dissipating! Thank God! he thinks. We’re okay! The army’s here! We’re saved! Oh wait… I killed everyone. Crane shot of Drayton screaming and crying. Fade out.
Okay, so I hated the ending. I hated it for many reasons, the least of which was I didn’t feel it fit. I just don’t buy Drayton killing his young son, as well as the other three people in the car, right after they made the big decision to leave the supermarket because they’d rather die fighting than just sitting around. Yeah, Drayton looks all tortured and torn up about it, but I still can’t believe he’d do it. I can’t believe the three other adults in the car would let him do it to them. I just didn’t buy it.
I feel like the ending was thought up by the kind of juvenile horror fan who thinks the genre is only about violence and gore and making the viewer walk away feeling like shit. To these people it isn’t possible for a horror movie to be in bad taste, because if someone feels that way, oh well, it’s a horror movie, right? That’s the point! Yeah, well, I’m a horror lover from way back, and I don’t agree with that definition at all. Horror can be horrifying, or offensive, or disturbing, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a certain finesse involved. Even a silly blood and boobies movie like Hostel had a better ending than The Mist.
The unfortunate part was that the ending would have been completely fine by me if it had happened about two minutes earlier, if Drayton had killed everyone in the car and then the movie fades to black, or Drayton runs out into the mist, or any other ending other than the cheap trick of having the army show up two seconds later and Whoops! you should have waited, now the mist is gone, the calvary is here, and you shot your little boy! Isn’t that funny? Do you get the irony?
Ohhhhh, I liked this movie so much up until the ending. Yes, the acting wasn’t great (although the woman playing the religious nut was excellent), yes, the special effects weren’t topnotch, but it was so much more than the sum of its parts, and it had so much working for it that I really felt it was a perfect companion piece to the novella. Up until the part where the movie deviates from the novella, which of course was the ending — an ending that was the total opposite of the one in the novella, I might add. I’ll spoil that one for you, too, because I don’t want you to think the source material was an equal downer. So if you don’t want to know how the novella ends, stop reading now… okay? At the end of the novella, Drayton and the others make it to a motel and it turns out Drayton has been writing down the whole story on hotel stationary. The mist is still around, no army guys have shown up, and he hasn’t shot his kid or any of the others. The message is that although they don’t know what’s happened, or if the mist is ever going to go away, they have hope. Hope. The exact opposite of the ending of the film, in other words. Gah, I’m so disappointed.
And as a horror fan I can get the whole downbeat ending. I can handle the shocker ending. But this isn’t the same thing. As I said before, it would have been a downbeat ending, or a shocker ending, if Drayton had killed the others and then the film ended. But they had to make it all into a big morbid joke by having the army showing up two minutest later, and a few seconds after that, oh look, the mist is clearing up. Terrible.
My wife HATED the ending. So much that it ruined the rest of the movie for her. I didn’t feel quite as strongly, but I agreed that the ending wasn’t appropriate.
Kat felt cheated that we had gotten to know and care about these characters and that to dispatch them in such a gruesome and stupid way was disrespectful and ruined the entire experience for her. Kat isn’t the kind of girl who turns her nose up at horror movies. She doesn’t just watch them because I make her. She likes horror movies. She just watched Planet Terror a couple of weeks ago and enjoyed it. She doesn’t mind apocalyptic cinema, she doesn’t expect a happy ending, but this just went beyond all of that.
I didn’t feel horrified by the ending. I didn’t feel disturbed or offended. I don’t know how I felt. I can’t think of the right word. Maybe it’s too soon. Maybe I’ll figure it out in a few days. All I can say right now is that if they had ended the movie before the army showed up, I’d be defending the ending. The fact that they had to turn it into a big WHOOPS!… well, I just didn’t like that. That’s all I can say.
On a lighter note, I told my wife that alternate endings were filmed (which will no doubt pop up on the DVD) and she said, “Well, they picked the wrong fucking one!”
So, in closing, I have very conflicted feelings about this movie. If you didn’t already notice, ha-ha. I can’t say that I hated it as much as Kathryn, because there is a lot to like, but I have such strong negative feelings about the ending that I can’t say I liked it, either. Quite honestly, I can’t say I’ve ever felt so conflicted about a movie. Not in a long time.
My quandary is that the negative aspect isn’t negative in the sense that I would suggest you avoid seeing this movie. You should see it, if only to find out how you react to the ending. I think opinions will vary. Every review I’ve read by those who saw it with more than one person have said the same thing: I liked the ending, my friend hated it, or vice versa.
You should see The Mist. I just don’t know if you’ll like it.
- Currently reading: "Code Warriors," by Jay Russell