June 19, 2003 @ 11:57 pm

The Oxford Manual of Style says the comma is "perhaps the most abused type of punctuation," and I’m inclined to agree.
There’s a story that goes around about a famous author who worked from his home. One day he joined his wife for lunch in the kitchen.
"You look exhausted," his wife said.
"I am," replied the author. "I spent the morning putting in a comma."
At dinner that evening, the author looked even worse.
"What did you do this afternoon that made you so much more tired?" his wife enquired.
The author sighed and said, "I took the comma out."
Comma usage is probably one of the most often discussed elements of proper grammar. To splice or not to splice? The most debated use of the comma would probably be that of the serial comma.
The serial comma separates two elements of a series, be they nouns, adjectives, adverbs, or predicates. For example, there are three serial commas in the previous sentence. The first one is your run-of-the-mill comma splice.
The "serial comma debate" centers on the use of the final comma in a series. For example, here’s a sentence where the author uses the final serial comma:
Brian’s restless eyes automatically recorded the usual litter of motel, gas stations, and fast-food restaurants.
[The Langoliers by Stephen King]
And here’s one where the author does not:
She came back to the table with the coffee, served her dad and sat down again.
[Out of Sight by Elmore Leonard]
Although most people seem to support the use of the serial comma, the decision as to whether or not you should use it is a personal one. Neither usage is incorrect.
I use the serial comma, myself, because I think it helps to clarify the elements in a series. Take a look at this example from The Handbook of Good English, by Edward D. Johnson:
I remember the gleam of the rain-washed pavement, the distant clattering of streetcars, the food smells wafting from the restaurant downstairs and the simple dress she wore.
Now, in this instance, the author has chosen not to use the final serial comma. But can the reader truly understand what he’s trying to say? To me, it seems as if he’s saying the food smells were wafting from the woman’s dress as well as from the restaurant. We can presume the author’s true intentions, but that final serial comma would remove all doubt.
Use it as a rule, even though it’s not a rule.
Ian


